This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/66483] [4.9 Regression] ICE (in add_stores, at var-tracking.c:6000) on arm-linux-gnueabihf


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66483

Thomas Preud'homme <thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org        |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #11 from Thomas Preud'homme <thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Thinking about this, there cannot be a regression by removing an assert so
having the bug not fully reproducible should not be an issue. I'll continue
looking for the cause of such variance but the backport of r212178 can be made
right now.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]