This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/65686] [5/6 regression] inconsistent warning maybe-uninitialized: warn about 'unsigned', not warn about 'int'


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65686

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |13962

--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note that you are basically relying on optimization to remove the uninitialized
load.

Where does this obfuscated 'return *(e->pu)' come from?

Related to PR13962 (to simplify the compare to false)


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962
[Bug 13962] [tree-ssa] make "fold" use alias information to optimize pointer
comparisons


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]