This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/55805] Empty brace-init-list causes warning "missing initializer for member" in C++11
- From: "dave.gittins at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:19:56 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/55805] Empty brace-init-list causes warning "missing initializer for member" in C++11
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-55805-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55805
--- Comment #6 from Gubbins <dave.gittins at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> (In reply to Gubbins from comment #2)
> > The original bug report points that in C++11 this is *not* aggregate
> > initialization, but is in fact value initialization (because this is a class
> > type with a default constructor).
>
> No it isn't, it's an aggregate.
It's clear that A is an aggregate type, but it is also a class type with a
default constructor. Doesn't the quoted section of the C++11 specification
therefore state that the object should be value-initialized?