This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/66358] [5/6 Regression] [SH] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2232


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66358

--- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #7)
> (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #6)
> > There could be some negative side effects with the patch above, because it
> > forces the R0 usage quite early (at RTL expansion).
> 
> Yes, the comment part says it and it was discussed in #c83
> and #c82 of PR55212.  This patch will be a 'micro-degradation',
> though it wins CSiBE for the code size at least, even without LRA.

Ah, right.  If it fixes the problem, then I think it's the only option we have
for the release branch.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]