This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/64798] [5 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.eh/badalloc1.C FAILs
- From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:42:23 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/64798] [5 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.eh/badalloc1.C FAILs
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-64798-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64798
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think aligned attribute is similarly useless for this, I'd really go for
testing alignments you need, rather than expecting some magic value. I'm not
aware of any target that would have bigger alignment for say
char/short/int/long than long long, ditto with float/double, so I'd just check
maximum of
long long, long double, void * alignment.