This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/64798] [5 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.eh/badalloc1.C FAILs
- From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:15:45 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/64798] [5 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.eh/badalloc1.C FAILs
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-64798-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64798
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Created attachment 34591
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34591&action=edit
> patch
>
> Ok, so it was bogus to assume size_t would cover the largest alignment needed.
> Can test check the attached patch please?
Initial testing (just rebuilding libstdc++ and re-running the test)
looked good. I'll fire off a full bootstrap for good measure, but that
will take a bit.
Thanks.
Rainer