This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/64735] std::future broken on armel
- From: "bastiaan at bjacques dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:33:15 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/64735] std::future broken on armel
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-64735-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735
--- Comment #5 from Bastiaan Jacques <bastiaan at bjacques dot org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> i.e. it's not broken, it's missing, and that's by design.
So is it the intention of the GCC developers that program writers targeting
such platforms simply avoid these facilities and use std::thread/mutex instead?