This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug testsuite/63439] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-33.c scan-tree-dump vect "Alignment of access forced using peeling"
- From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:30:53 +0000
- Subject: [Bug testsuite/63439] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-33.c scan-tree-dump vect "Alignment of access forced using peeling"
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-63439-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63439
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
[...]
> For SPARC we use v8qi and peel for alignment. That should be handled
> but it looks like SPARC is not vect64 for whatever reason :/
>
> Rainer, can you please make SPARC vect64?
When I do this, the vect-33.c test now passes, both 32 and 64-bit, but
the other gcc.dg/vect tests refering to vect64 start FAILing instead:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-11.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2 "basic block
vectorized"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-26.c scan-tree-dump-times slp1 "basic block
vectorized" 1
I'm attaching the 32-bit slp? dumps for reference.
Rainer