This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/64612] [5 Regression] profiledbootstrap failures
- From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:03:49 +0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/64612] [5 Regression] profiledbootstrap failures
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-64612-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64612
--- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> If you are willing to cook up an effective-target for that in
> lib/target-supports.exp, sure, go ahead.
Given the complexity of the HAVE_COMDAT_GROUP test in gcc/configure.ac,
the best way seems to have gcc define something like
__GCC_HAVE_COMDAT_GROUP and use that in target-supports.exp.
Rainer