This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c/64709] [5 Regression] Bogus -Wmissing-field-initializers warning
- From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:15:39 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c/64709] [5 Regression] Bogus -Wmissing-field-initializers warning
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-64709-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64709
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I wonder if that might not be undesirable in some cases, perhaps allow the
users to choose? -Wmissing-field-initializers ==
-Wmissing-field-initializers=1 (enabled in -Wall or where) would do what you
suggest, -Wmissing-field-initializers=2 would warn even for this?