This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug libgcc/64677] incorrect result with complex division?


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64677

--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Sanjay Patel from comment #5)
> (In reply to Mikhail Maltsev from comment #3)
> > So, compile-time result is more precise. BTW, what does the disassembly look
> > like?
> 
> In the -O0 case, it looks like all of the math is handled in:
>  	call	___ieee_divdc3


Is this the one in libgcc or part of Apple's libc?  If it is part of Apple's
libc, then the bug is there.  Apple's libc implementation of ___ieee_divdc3 has
known issues IIRC.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]