This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/63733] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] [OOP] wrong resolution for OPERATOR generics
- From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 13:57:12 +0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/63733] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] [OOP] wrong resolution for OPERATOR generics
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-63733-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63733
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |janus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #5)
> (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> > likely r189022 (pr49591).
>
> I think this one is the culprit. Reverting the relevant part restores the
> expected behavior. Patch:
As expected, this fails on typebound_operator_16.f03, but nothing else.