This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug sanitizer/61604] missing line numbers in a sanitizer backtrace from an OMP region
- From: "Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 07:42:20 +0000
- Subject: [Bug sanitizer/61604] missing line numbers in a sanitizer backtrace from an OMP region
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-61604-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61604
Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz
| |.ch
--- Comment #1 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> ---
for reference, valgrind yields a better trace, suggesting that the debug info
is at least available:
==5301== 400 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 5 of 7
==5301== at 0x4A0534D: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:291)
==5301== by 0x400795: s1_._omp_fn.0 (PR61604.f90:4)
==5301== by 0x4D5D76D: gomp_thread_start (team.c:117)
==5301== by 0x3F924079D0: start_thread (in /lib64/libpthread-2.12.so)
==5301== by 0x3F918E8B6C: clone (in /lib64/libc-2.12.so)
==5301==
==5301== 400 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 6 of 7
==5301== at 0x4A0534D: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:291)
==5301== by 0x400795: s1_._omp_fn.0 (PR61604.f90:4)
==5301== by 0x4D5A63E: GOMP_parallel (parallel.c:167)
==5301== by 0x4007C3: s1_ (PR61604.f90:1)
==5301== by 0x4007E2: main (PR61604.f90:9)