This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/61489] Wrong warning with -Wmissing-field-initializers.
- From: "D.Bahadir at GMX dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 22:55:07 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/61489] Wrong warning with -Wmissing-field-initializers.
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-61489-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61489
--- Comment #5 from Deniz Bahadir <D.Bahadir at GMX dot de> ---
Thanks again.
Then I need to appologize for misunderstanding the meaning of the warning-flag.
Because of several internet-sources, like the one I cited, I always thought
that the cases of addr3 and addr7 were the prefered way of explicitely forcing
zero-initialization of all struct members (especially if the number of
struct-members are subject to change in the future).
If I understand you correctly, a better/cleaner way which achieves the exact
same is using the cases of addr2 and addr6.
Then I would rephrase my original statement and suggest that no warning will be
issued for cases of addr2, addr6 and addr9.