This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug libfortran/58015] FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90: Unsatisfied symbol "nextafterl"


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58015

Francois-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX

--- Comment #11 from Francois-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I don't think we want to provide a full long double fallback libc as part of
gfortran. So, I'll close this as WONTFIX: the testcases have been XFAIL'ed, and
the proper course now is to for those targets to provide a full libc, or for
users not to rely on long double types in the meantime.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]