This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/61336] ICE on alpha: in print_operand_address, at config/alpha/alpha.c:5454


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61336

--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
You're absolutely right it shouldn't ICE.  The proper solution to
anything we can't handle here should result in a call to 
output_operand_lossage, which produces a graceful error when applied
to an asm.

As for whether that symbol should have been split, or whether we should
just go ahead and allow this case for asms...  I don't currently have a
good answer.  I'll try to have a closer look soon.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]