[Bug target/61377] [4.10 Regression] Bootstrap failure on x86_64-apple-darwin13

["howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61377

Jack Howarth <howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com

--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth <howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> Caused by r211089. Fixed by the patch at
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg02689.html.

The patch posted there is malformed. It appears to have been hand-editted to
removeâ

   [(set_attr "type" "call")])

+; TODO
+(define_peephole2
+  [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand")
+        (match_operand:DI 1 "memory_operand"))
+   (unspec_volatile [(const_int 0)] UNSPECV_BLOCKAGE)]
+  "TARGET_64BIT"
+  [(unspec_volatile [(const_int 0)] UNSPECV_BLOCKAGE)
+   (set (match_dup 0)
+        (match_dup 1))])
+
+(define_peephole2
+  [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand")
+        (match_operand:SI 1 "memory_operand"))
+   (unspec_volatile [(const_int 0)] UNSPECV_BLOCKAGE)]
+  "!TARGET_64BIT"
+  [(unspec_volatile [(const_int 0)] UNSPECV_BLOCKAGE)
+   (set (match_dup 0)
+        (match_dup 1))])
+
+(define_peephole2
+  [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand")
+        (match_operand:DI 1 "memory_operand"))
+   (call (mem:QI (match_operand:DI 2 "register_operand"))
+         (match_operand 3))]
+  "TARGET_64BIT  && REG_P (operands[0]) && 0
+    && REG_P (operands[2])
+    && REGNO (operands[0]) == REGNO (operands[2])"
+  [(call (mem:QI (match_dup 1)) (match_dup 1))])
+
 (define_expand "call_pop"
   [(parallel [(call (match_operand:QI 0)
             (match_operand:SI 1))

from the original patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg02686.html rather than having been
properly regenerated. Is unclear what exactly was approved here.