This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/53708] [4.8 Regression] Many failures of the objc tests with -O3 -fnext-runtime and -m32


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53708

--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2012-10-30 17:10:52 UTC ---
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, bergner at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53708
> 
> Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
>                  CC|                            |bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
>          Resolution|FIXED                       |
> 
> --- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-10-30 15:47:57 UTC ---
> Richard, I'm seeing this same bug in GCC 4.7 on powerpc64-linux when compiling
> GLIBC.  Is there a chance we can get your patch backported to 4.7?  I
> bootstrapped and regtested the backport with no regressions and can confirm it
> fixes the bug I'm running into, which can be seen with the reduced test case
> from glibc:
> 
> bergner@bns:~/gcc/BUGS> cat foo.i 
> static void (*const init_array []) (void)
>   __attribute__ ((section (".init_array"), aligned (sizeof (void *)), used))
> = { 0 };
> 
> bergner@bns:~/gcc/BUGS> /home/bergner/gcc/build/gcc-fsf-4_7-base/gcc/xgcc
> -B/home/bergner/gcc/build/gcc-fsf-4_7-base/gcc -S -m64 -O3 -maltivec foo.i -o
> bad.s
> 
> bergner@bns:~/gcc/BUGS> /home/bergner/gcc/build/gcc-fsf-4_7-pr53708/gcc/xgcc
> -B/home/bergner/gcc/build/gcc-fsf-4_7-pr53708/gcc -S -m64 -O3 -maltivec foo.i
> -o good.s
> 
> bergner@bns:~/gcc/BUGS> diff -u bad.s good.s 
> --- bad.s    2012-10-30 10:41:15.000000000 -0500
> +++ good.s    2012-10-30 10:41:23.000000000 -0500
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>      .section    ".toc","aw"
>      .section    ".text"
>      .section    .init_array,"a"
> -    .align 4
> +    .align 3
>      .type    init_array, @object
>      .size    init_array, 8
>  init_array:
> 
> The above is bad, because the extra alignment causes the linker to add some
> null padding to the init_array and the loader isn't expecting that and ends up
> segv'ing.

Certainly - but can you check there wasn't a followup for fallout?
ISTR something here ...


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]