This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/53708] [4.8 Regression] Many failures of the objc tests with -O3 -fnext-runtime and -m32
- From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:10:52 +0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/53708] [4.8 Regression] Many failures of the objc tests with -O3 -fnext-runtime and -m32
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-53708-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53708
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2012-10-30 17:10:52 UTC ---
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, bergner at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53708
>
> Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
> CC| |bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
> Resolution|FIXED |
>
> --- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-10-30 15:47:57 UTC ---
> Richard, I'm seeing this same bug in GCC 4.7 on powerpc64-linux when compiling
> GLIBC. Is there a chance we can get your patch backported to 4.7? I
> bootstrapped and regtested the backport with no regressions and can confirm it
> fixes the bug I'm running into, which can be seen with the reduced test case
> from glibc:
>
> bergner@bns:~/gcc/BUGS> cat foo.i
> static void (*const init_array []) (void)
> __attribute__ ((section (".init_array"), aligned (sizeof (void *)), used))
> = { 0 };
>
> bergner@bns:~/gcc/BUGS> /home/bergner/gcc/build/gcc-fsf-4_7-base/gcc/xgcc
> -B/home/bergner/gcc/build/gcc-fsf-4_7-base/gcc -S -m64 -O3 -maltivec foo.i -o
> bad.s
>
> bergner@bns:~/gcc/BUGS> /home/bergner/gcc/build/gcc-fsf-4_7-pr53708/gcc/xgcc
> -B/home/bergner/gcc/build/gcc-fsf-4_7-pr53708/gcc -S -m64 -O3 -maltivec foo.i
> -o good.s
>
> bergner@bns:~/gcc/BUGS> diff -u bad.s good.s
> --- bad.s 2012-10-30 10:41:15.000000000 -0500
> +++ good.s 2012-10-30 10:41:23.000000000 -0500
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
> .section ".toc","aw"
> .section ".text"
> .section .init_array,"a"
> - .align 4
> + .align 3
> .type init_array, @object
> .size init_array, 8
> init_array:
>
> The above is bad, because the extra alignment causes the linker to add some
> null padding to the init_array and the loader isn't expecting that and ends up
> segv'ing.
Certainly - but can you check there wasn't a followup for fallout?
ISTR something here ...