This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug lto/54966] Does LTO requires a larger inline-unit-growth?
- From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:43:45 +0000
- Subject: [Bug lto/54966] Does LTO requires a larger inline-unit-growth?
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-54966-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54966
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |lto
CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-10-18 09:43:45 UTC ---
I'm not sure how we count the initial unit size, given that when not using
LTO not merged comdats are probably counted here, so overall they add up
while the initial LTO unit size may be considerably smaller than the sum
of the non-LTO unit sizes.
Honza?