This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/54967] [4.8 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:55
- From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 08:44:10 +0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/54967] [4.8 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:55
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-54967-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54967
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC| |hubicka at ucw dot cz
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2012-10-18 08:44:10 UTC ---
> I assume it is:
>
> r190978 | rguenth | 2012-09-05 15:29:13 +0200 (Wed, 05 Sep 2012) | 11 lines
>
> 2012-09-05 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
I don't think so: r192440 is OK (copy and paste error in comment #1). Actually
r192449 is also OK.
Indeed this does rule out that a post r192449 revision has only uncovered a
latent bug caused by an earlier revision.