This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/54762] [SH] Utilize zero-displacement branches for conditional far branches
- From: "olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 18:07:30 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/54762] [SH] Utilize zero-displacement branches for conditional far branches
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-54762-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54762
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-10-08 18:07:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> When you do this, I'd recommend generating "real" labels in gcc based on %=
> (say, ".L.fb%=" instead of local labels, which should be left to the gcc user.
Thanks for the hint! It would be a general issue in the SH port though. There
are already a lot of places where local forward/backward labels are used in the
output asm...