This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug fortran/45586] [4.8 Regression] ICE non-trivial conversion at assignment


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586

--- Comment #70 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2012-07-30 08:43:09 UTC ---
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
> 
> --- Comment #69 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-28 09:46:00 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #63)
> > With a (seemingly) unrelated patch (attached to PR52097) I'm back on ICEing
> > for the gfortran.dg/lto/pr45586*.f90 testcases ...
> > 
> > Even before the adjusted type merging we have (at compile-time)
> > 
> [...]
> > 
> > _BUT_(!) its main-variant is
> > 
> [...]
> > 
> > thus has a restrict-qualified data field.  That's bogus as TYPE_FIELDS
> > is supposed to be shared amongst variant types.
> 
> So, is this a fortran front-end bug, a middle-end bug, or a lto bug ?
> (Hint: PR 51765 is a marked as a lto bug ;-) )

It's a frontend bug.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]