This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/53787] Possible IPA-SRA / IPA-CP improvement
- From: "steven at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 22:49:16 +0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/53787] Possible IPA-SRA / IPA-CP improvement
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-53787-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787
Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-26 22:49:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Now if we could somehow propagate &10 into the actual argument of the
> call statement, IPA-CP should pick it up and propagate it into the
> caller. Another alternative is to construct an aggregate jump
> function for it when we have them. I'll keep this testcase in mind
> when working on them.
Shouldn't IPA-CP be able to do this already? It does appear to handle
CONST_DECLs already...