This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/43716] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Revision 158105 miscompiles doduc.f90
- From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 13:51:59 +0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/43716] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Revision 158105 miscompiles doduc.f90
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-43716-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43716
--- Comment #37 from Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> 2012-07-21 13:51:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #36)
> > To me, it looks like invalid test. Any fortraners here to share their opinion?
>
> Please read comments #23 and #24. One problem with NaN is that they propagate
> until something trap them. When did you get a successful compilation?
No, the first NaN was born exactly at this instruction. Please note 0 / 0
which is the definition of NaN.