This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/54025] atomic<chrono::duration> won't compile: chrono::duration::duration() is not C++11 compliant
- From: "daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 15:18:16 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/54025] atomic<chrono::duration> won't compile: chrono::duration::duration() is not C++11 compliant
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-54025-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54025
--- Comment #13 from Daniel KrÃgler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> 2012-07-19 15:18:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Ah! Let's add in CC both Benjamin and Daniel then.
I more and more tend to change my mind: I recommend to ignore the
recommendation of N3303 and to make duration conforming with the current
library spec. The described use-case here makes very much sense to me and
demonstrates to me that N3303 did overreact here. But I would be happy to hear
Benjamin's position as well.