This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libmudflap/53952] New: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx ( -O[123]) execution test
- From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 13:35:15 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libmudflap/53952] New: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx ( -O[123]) execution test
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53952
Bug #: 53952
Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx
( -O[123]) execution test
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libmudflap
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: rguenth@gcc.gnu.org
I see since quite some time
FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx ( -O) execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx (-O2) execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx (-O3) execution test
with -O0 it does not fail.
I suspect stricter variable lifetime handling but did not try to confirm.