This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug lto/53831] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Virtuals missing in LTO symtab


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53831

--- Comment #19 from Yuri Gribov <tetra2005 at gmail dot com> 2012-07-03 16:55:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)

> The testcase is fixed when using -fno-fat-lto-objects and gcc-ar

For me x64_64-linux version works if I use gcc-ar (both with and without
-fno-fat-lto-objects).

> (which is not required, or should not be required(?) for -ffat-lto-objects?)

No idea, today is the first time I hear about gcc-nm/ar. Are there any online
docs? Are users supposed to create LTO archives with gcc-ar instead of good ol'
ar these days?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]