This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug lto/53831] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Virtuals missing in LTO symtab


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53831

--- Comment #14 from Yuri Gribov <tetra2005 at gmail dot com> 2012-07-03 13:31:28 UTC ---
> you need to use the LTO aware nm that gcc installs, gcc-nm.  It says

My bad.

> Btw, removing the 'inline' keyword everywhere still reproduces the issue.
> That makes the testcase certainly valid.
  $ make USE_LTO=1 clean all
  $ echo $?
  0
Are you sure? Adding -Dinline= to CXXFLAGS fixed compilation for me:
I wasn't using -fno-fat-lto-objects though.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]