This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/53380] .ehframe could be smaller
- From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 12:55:30 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/53380] .ehframe could be smaller
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-53380-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53380
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-05-22 12:55:30 UTC ---
Adding default handling if there is no FDE is an ABI change, so can't be done
on existing architectures (except those that have that in their ABI already).
Why do you care about the .eh_frame size so much? If you don't use the unwind
info, it often won't be even paged in, or can be discarded from RAM if needed.
And if you need it, it better be accurrate.