This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug rtl-optimization/53422] reduce the size of CODE_LABEL rtl


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53422

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-05-21 10:41:03 UTC ---
The reason for the extra fields in BARRIER and CODE_LABEL is to make it
possible for a BARRIER or CODE_LABEL to be turned into
INSN/JUMP_INSN/CALL_INSN.  So you'd need to verify it isn't needed anywhere. 
Note, your reordering of CODE_LABEL fields doesn't change anything on the
allocated size, even tail 0 format fields are allocated.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]