This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug fortran/53328] [OOP] Ambiguous check for type-bound GENERIC shall ignore PASSed arguments


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53328

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-05-11 21:42:00 UTC ---
See Fortran 2003, 16.2.3 for details.

(For type-bound operators, the PASS argument itself also plays a role in
distinguishing the calls - thus, it cannot completely be ignored. For
type-bound generic names, I think the PASS argument should be always be
indistinguishable.)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]