This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug lto/50602] ICE in tree_nrv, at tree-nrv.c:155 during large LTO build
- From: "andi at firstfloor dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 13:08:08 +0000
- Subject: [Bug lto/50602] ICE in tree_nrv, at tree-nrv.c:155 during large LTO build
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-50602-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50602
--- Comment #24 from andi at firstfloor dot org 2012-05-07 13:08:08 UTC ---
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 08:54:10AM +0000, rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50602
>
> --- Comment #23 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2012-05-07 08:54:10 UTC ---
> On Sat, 5 May 2012, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50602
> >
> > Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
> >
> > What |Removed |Added
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
> >
> > --- Comment #22 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-05-05 10:02:15 UTC ---
> > great, backporting to 4.7 should be easy, right?
>
> I'm not sure we should backport option handling changes. In general
> we still expect consistent options at compile and link time (that did
> not change in 4.7 - what changed was the implementation).
I worked around it in my kernel build, so it's not critial.
But there are other problems back now :-(
-Andi