This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug rtl-optimization/44141] Redundant loads and stores generated for AMD bdver1 target
- From: "venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:32:31 +0000
- Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/44141] Redundant loads and stores generated for AMD bdver1 target
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-44141-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
--- Comment #13 from Venkataramanan <venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com> 2012-03-28 10:32:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Having a vector mode changing subreg on the LHS of an instruction is a very
> common issue in the i386 backend, and unfortunately e.g. means that lots of
> insns can't be combined or simplified. I wonder if the expansion sometimes
> shouldn't use a non-subregged temporary as lhs and add a move from subreg of
> the temporary to the desired destination.
The expander now converts as shown below for unaligned moves with V2DF mode.
if (TARGET_SSE_PACKED_SINGLE_INSN_OPTIMAL)
{
op0 = gen_lowpart (V4SFmode, op0);
op1 = gen_lowpart (V4SFmode, op1);
emit_insn (gen_sse_movups (op0, op1));
return;
}
You mean conversion is not needed here?
> BTW, if with TARGET_SSE_PACKED_SINGLE_INSN_OPTIMAL ps is more desirable than pd
> for movs, then perhaps it would be better to add a mode attr similar to
> ssemodesuffix, which would emit pd or ps for V2DFmode depending on
> TARGET_SSE_PACKED_SINGLE_INSN_OPTIMAL (see e.g. i128 mode attr).
Yes with TARGET_SSE_PACKED_SINGLE_INSN_OPTIMAL we want to generate movups
instead of movupd.