This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/52745] New: GCC4.7 vector uses copy instead of move constructor
- From: "J.W.Rogers+gcc at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:43:41 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/52745] New: GCC4.7 vector uses copy instead of move constructor
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52745
Bug #: 52745
Summary: GCC4.7 vector uses copy instead of move constructor
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: J.W.Rogers+gcc@gmail.com
Using GCC 4.7.0, vector seems to prefer copy rather than move when resizing.
The following program produces different (and I think incorrect) results under
GCC 4.7.0 vs GCC 4.6.1
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
struct Stuff
{
Stuff( ) { }
Stuff( Stuff&& o ) { std::cout << "Move" << std::endl; }
Stuff( const Stuff& o ) { std::cout << "Copy" << std::endl; }
};
int main( const int argc, const char** argv )
{
std::vector< Stuff > stuff;
std::cout << "1" << std::endl;
stuff.push_back( Stuff() );
std::cout << "2" << std::endl;
stuff.push_back( Stuff() );
std::cout << "3" << std::endl;
stuff.push_back( Stuff() );
}
Here is the output under GCC 4.6.1
jonathan@grindserv:~$ g++-4.6.1 -std=c++0x test.cpp
jonathan@grindserv:~$ ./a.out
1
Move
2
Move
Move
3
Move
Move
Move
Here is the output under GCC 4.7.0
jonathan@grindserv:~$ g++-4.7.0 -std=c++0x test.cpp
jonathan@grindserv:~$ ./a.out
1
Move
2
Move
Copy
3
Move
Copy
Copy