This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/52650] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr51106-2.c * (internal compiler error)
- From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 13:57:34 +0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/52650] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr51106-2.c * (internal compiler error)
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-52650-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2012-03-21 13:57:34 UTC ---
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
>
> --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2012-03-21 13:51:46 UTC ---
> > --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2012-03-21 13:38:28 UTC ---
> [...]
> > If they are related (which I doubt), removing the call to cleanup_cfg
> > in cfgexpand.c should fix them. That's the only real change in
> > this patch - previously the cleanup_cfg call was conditional on a
> > present EH region tree (thus, all of these issues are latent and
> > just require a slightly different testcase)
>
> Indeed: with your patch applied and the call #if 0'd, the tests still pass.
and with #if 1 they fail? As they are wrong-code regressions on
an architecture I have no access to, can you see what is the issue here?
Thanks.
Richard.