This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug testsuite/52614] [4.8 Regression] Test failures in gcc.dg/vect: vectorizing unaligned access
- From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:16:45 +0000
- Subject: [Bug testsuite/52614] [4.8 Regression] Test failures in gcc.dg/vect: vectorizing unaligned access
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-52614-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52614
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2012-03-20
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2012-03-20 15:16:45 UTC ---
> The tests reported in PR52603 are still failing on arm (last tested on trunk
> r185474).
When asked on IRC, Richard Guenther said he preferred a new PR rather than
reopening PR52603. He also asked me to test the addition of -fno-common to
DEFAULT_VECTCFLAGS in gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect.exp (patch in comment #0).
Could some of you test it on your favorite plaforms (it is enough to vect.exp
only)?