This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/33101] [DR 577] Bad C++ error on invalid code: <anonymous> has incomplete type
- From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 20:17:02 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/33101] [DR 577] Bad C++ error on invalid code: <anonymous> has incomplete type
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-33101-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33101
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Bad C++ error on invalid |[DR 577] Bad C++ error on
|code: <anonymous> has |invalid code: <anonymous>
|incomplete type |has incomplete type
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-16 20:17:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> I believe that the resolution of DR 577:
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#577
> confirms this. The resolution, as of August, 2011, suggests changing
> the wording to refer to the *type* void rather than the keyword.
> (That change doesn't appear in the N3270 draft; I don't know whether
> it appears in the final ISO C++ 2011 standard.)
It doesn't, the DR says [Voted into the WP at the February, 2012 meeting.]
i.e. after the 2011 standard.
> At the very least, since there is (unfortunately) real-world code that
> depends on this, I suggest changing it from a fatal error to a warning,
> though I think removing the diagnostic altogether would be better.
Since GCC, Clang and EDG all reject it today I'm surprised such real-world code
hasn't been changed already.