This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/48820] TR 29113: Implement parts needed for MPI 3
- From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 07:19:51 +0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/48820] TR 29113: Implement parts needed for MPI 3
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-48820-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
--- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-08 07:19:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Re-reading the standard, I think the non-BIND(C) version of TYPE(*) is
> currently mishandled. That should be only visible for "TYPE(*)" dummies which
> are INTENT(OUT) and where the actual argument is a derived type with default
> initialization or has allocatable components (possibly even with finalization
> subroutines).
>
> See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-03/msg00037.html and
> http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2012-March/005113.html
Some J3 members seem to agree that that's not a good idea. To add a link to a
thread in yet another mailing list:
http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/interop-tr/2012-March/001058.html
Thus, the current type(*) implementation seems to be okay.