This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/51244] SH Target: Inefficient conditional branch
- From: "olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 08:26:06 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/51244] SH Target: Inefficient conditional branch
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-51244-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #14 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-06 08:26:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 08:13 +0900, Kaz Kojima wrote:
>
> > I've tested your latest patch on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu with trunk
> > revision 184872. It looks that some new failures are poping up:
> >
> > New tests that FAIL:
> >
> > 22_locale/ctype/is/char/3.cc execution test
> > 27_io/basic_filebuf/underflow/wchar_t/9178.cc execution test
> > gfortran.dg/widechar_intrinsics_6.f90 -Os execution test
> >
> > Pehaps failures might be ones you've suggested in #10 in
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
> >
> > Could you double check?
>
> Of course! Doing so now...
I've run the testsuite on rev 184966 (without fortran though), but the failures
that you've mentioned did not show up. Usually when I rebuild the whole
toolchain including newlib, I have C/CPP/CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET set to '-Os
-mpretend-cmove'. This time I removed those, but the results seem to be the
same. Could you also please try again? This is suspicious...