This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug fortran/52439] Calculation of natural log


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52439

kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P3                          |P4
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2012-02-29
                 CC|                            |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-29 19:51:59 UTC ---
What happens if you use double precision literal constants?
Is 0.01 exactly representable in a binary floating point 
format.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]