This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/52367] Many incorrect thumb insn lengths


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52367

Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2012-02-24
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement

--- Comment #1 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-24 11:35:23 UTC ---
Over estimating is safe, though potentially sub-optimal.  The concern is mainly
around under-estimating, which can lead to broken code.  Beware, however that
if an insn pattern generates more than one assembly language instruction then
all the length costs will be associated with one instruction (normally the
last).

R.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]