[Bug c++/44783] implement -ftemplate-backtrace-limit=

["manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783

--- Comment #9 from Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-14 14:27:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Thanks Manuel. Thus, I'm going to test your patch. Was wondering, maybe we want
> the nit: 'n_total > template_backtrace_limit + 2' n the condition, in order to
> keep by default exactly the current behavior?

This is why I wanted a testcase. The ones that are in the testsuite from when I
added this behaviour do not trigger the "skipping message" anymore, since later
I implemented recognizing the recursive template (which is much nicer IMHO). So
we need a testcase that triggers this (like a very deep instantiation or
something that the recursion detection cannot handle).

n_total >= 12 == n_total > template_backtrace_limit + 1

The +1 is basically giving enough space, so at least we always print 2 template
instantiations, one before and one after the "skipping". However, if
template_backtrace_limit=1 and n_total = 2, should we print just 1 (new patch)
or still 2 (old behavior)? This was not a problem before because
template_backtrace_limit was always 10.

> Otherwise, shall I send the patch to the mailing list for you? Thanks again.

Yes, please. Feel free also to edit it or completely modify it. Thanks.