This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/52201] FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic/operators/51811.cc (test for excess errors)
- From: "dave.anglin at bell dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:41:42 +0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/52201] FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic/operators/51811.cc (test for excess errors)
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-52201-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52201
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-02-10 22:41:42 UTC ---
On 2/10/2012 5:26 PM, amacleod at redhat dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52201
>
> Andrew Macleod<amacleod at redhat dot com> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CC| |amacleod at redhat dot com
>
> --- Comment #1 from Andrew Macleod<amacleod at redhat dot com> 2012-02-10 22:26:59 UTC ---
> Does this target support atomics and multi-threaded at all?
>
> do any tests in gcc/gcc.dg/atomic* run or are they all unsupported?
>
The target doesn't support atomics. There is only only one atomic
instruction (ldcw).
There is pthread and semaphore support.
gcc.dg/atomic-flag.c, gcc.dg/atomic-generic.c, gcc.dg/atomic-lockfree.c,
gcc.dg/atomic-noinline-aux.c,
gcc.dg/atomic-noinline.c pass. The remainder are unsupported
Dave