This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/51921] [4.6/4.7 regression] EH unwinding support is broken
- From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:54:18 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/51921] [4.6/4.7 regression] EH unwinding support is broken
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-51921-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-07 17:54:18 UTC ---
> You know perfectly well that such a proof is practically impossible:
> that would mean updating a machine through every single Solaris 8/9/10
> kernel/libc/libthread patch ever released. The other way round, I'd
> claim that you cannot prove that the old code works for every since such
> combination either.
I cannot indeed, but we now have a case where the old code used to work and the
new code fails. Granted, this isn't an official release, but it's annoying and
casts a legitimate doubt on the robustness of the new code.
> You claimed that before, and that's what I tried at first to make
> Solaris 11 work, but failed completely.
OK, do you know of a Solaris 11 machine to which I could have access? AdaCore
doesn't have one for the time being.
> Why didn't you object then when it was submitted *and accepted*, has
> been in for almost a year, been shipped with a release, and revert it
> shortly before the next release?
I already managed to block a backport to the 4.5 branch. :-) As for the
shortly, I wrote a first message on 11/28, got no answers, then applied the
change on 01/09, that is to say about 3 months before the planned shipping
date.