This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/52129] wrong code to pass parameters to tail call function


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52129

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2012-02-06
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot       |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   |gnu.org                     |
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-06 09:46:59 UTC ---
Created attachment 26580
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26580
gcc47-pr52129.patch

Untested fix.

Seems on this testcase pretend_args_size is non-zero, and argblock is
initialized for sibcall sequences as:
          argblock = crtl->args.internal_arg_pointer;
          argblock
#ifdef STACK_GROWS_DOWNWARD
            = plus_constant (argblock, crtl->args.pretend_args_size);
#else
            = plus_constant (argblock, -crtl->args.pretend_args_size);
#endif
and what is stored into stored_args_map is relative to that argblock
(arg->locate.slot_offset.constant based), while the testing is done with
offsets relative to crtl->args.internal_arg_pointer.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]