This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/51502] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Potentially wrong code generation due to wrong implict_pure check
- From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 08:19:01 +0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/51502] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Potentially wrong code generation due to wrong implict_pure check
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-51502-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51502
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-12-31 08:19:01 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Dec 31 08:18:52 2011
New Revision: 182754
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182754
Log:
2011-12-31 Thomas KÃnig <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/51502
* expr.c (gfc_check_vardef_context): When determining
implicit pure status, also check for variable definition
context. Walk up namespaces until a procedure is
found to reset the implict pure attribute.
* resolve.c (gfc_implicit_pure): Walk up namespaces
until a procedure is found.
2011-12-31 Thomas KÃnig <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/51502
* lib/gcc-dg.exp (scan-module-absence): New function.
* gfortran.dg/implicit_pure_2.f90: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/implicit_pure_2.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/expr.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog