[Bug bootstrap/51599] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure

["hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51599

             Bug #: 51599
           Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.6.3
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: bootstrap
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: hjl.tools@gmail.com
                CC: rth@gcc.gnu.org


Revision 182428 gave

../../src-trunk/gcc/cp/error.c: In function 'void
print_instantiation_full_context(diagnostic_context*)':
../../src-trunk/gcc/cp/error.c:3001:13: error: unknown conversion type
character 'S' in format [-Werror=format]
../../src-trunk/gcc/cp/error.c: In function 'void
print_instantiation_partial_context_line(diagnostic_context*, const
tinst_level*, location_t, bool)':
../../src-trunk/gcc/cp/error.c:3035:15: error: unknown conversion type
character 'S' in format [-Werror=format]
../../src-trunk/gcc/cp/error.c:3035:15: error: unknown conversion type
character 'S' in format [-Werror=format]
../../src-trunk/gcc/cp/error.c:3035:15: error: too many arguments for format
[-Werror=format-extra-args]
At global scope:
cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-narrowing" [-Werror]
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors

make[6]: *** [cp/error.o] Error 1
make[6]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
../../src-trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c: In function 'int push_tinst_level(tree)':
../../src-trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c:8046:27: error: unknown conversion type character
'S' in format [-Werror=format]
../../src-trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c:8046:27: error: too many arguments for format
[-Werror=format-extra-args]
In file included from ../../src-trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c:20540:0:
At global scope:
cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-narrowing" [-Werror]
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors

make[6]: *** [cp/pt.o] Error 1

Revision 182419 is OK. It may be caused by revision 182424:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-12/msg00563.html