This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/50283] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/eh/simd-1.C execution test
- From: "dave.anglin at bell dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 04:12:48 +0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/50283] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/eh/simd-1.C execution test
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-50283-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50283
--- Comment #14 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-12-17 04:12:48 UTC ---
On 15-Dec-11, at 9:16 PM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50283
>
> --- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org>
> 2011-12-16 02:16:00 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #10)
>> On 27-Nov-11, at 1:59 PM, rth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>>
>>> You don't. We're supposed to prevent frame-related insns
>>> from appearing in branch delay slots.
>>
>> Is this a reorg issue?
>
> I am creating more generic patch for this for all targets that use
> branch delay
> slots.
My question may have been a bit obtuse but I got the impression that
this should
be treated as a target specific problem. Would you please revert my
target patch
with your generic patch?
Thanks,
Dave
--
John David Anglin dave.anglin@bell.net