This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/51540] New: partial_sum (int *, int *, int *, multiplies < int >) does not use operator +(complex, complex)
- From: "giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:06:32 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/51540] New: partial_sum (int *, int *, int *, multiplies < int >) does not use operator +(complex, complex)
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540
Bug #: 51540
Summary: partial_sum (int *, int *, int *, multiplies < int >)
does not use operator +(complex, complex)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/latest-doxygen
/a01567.html#a17bad49fa9fb1c5c41d019b16970fe9e
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl
Host: i586-suse-linux
Target: i586-suse-linux
Build: i586-suse-linux
The following code fails to run:
int main ()
{
int x [02] = { 0, 01 };
::std ::partial_sum (x, x + 02, x, ::std ::multiplies < int > ());
assert (+x [01] == 01);
return +EXIT_SUCCESS; }
Actual result:
int main(): Assertion `+x [01] == 01' failed.
Expected result:
I do not know,
as the documentation does not say which complex class should be used.
Maybe it should not compile at all.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Bug libstdc++/51540] partial_sum (int *, int *, int *, multiplies < int >) does not use operator +(complex, complex)
- From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug libstdc++/51540] partial_sum (int *, int *, int *, multiplies < int >) does not use operator +(complex, complex)
- From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug libstdc++/51540] partial_sum (int *, int *, int *, multiplies < int >) does not use operator +(complex, complex)
- From: giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl
- [Bug libstdc++/51540] partial_sum (int *, int *, int *, multiplies < int >) does not use operator +(complex, complex)
- From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
- [Bug libstdc++/51540] partial_sum (int *, int *, int *, multiplies < int >) does not use operator +(complex, complex)
- From: giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl
- [Bug libstdc++/51540] partial_sum (int *, int *, int *, multiplies < int >) does not use operator +(complex, complex)
- From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
- [Bug libstdc++/51540] partial_sum (int *, int *, int *, multiplies < int >) does not use operator +(complex, complex)
- From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading
- From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading
- From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
- [Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading
- From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading
- From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading
- From: giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl
- [Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading
- From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
- [Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading
- From: giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl
- [Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading
- From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading
- From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading
- From: giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl
- [Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading
- From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading
- From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org