This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug rtl-optimization/51505] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in form_sum, at reload.c:5349 with -O --param max-cse-insns=1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51505

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bonzini at gnu dot org

--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-12-13 11:02:32 UTC ---
> IMHO the problem is that we have a REG_EQUAL note that refers to dead pseudos,
> perhaps DF should just remove such notes? 

I'd think so.  When DF adds REG_DEAD/REG_UNUSED notes, it knowingly ignores
REG_EQUAL/REG_EQUIV notes (even if you do df_set_flags (DF_EQ_NOTES) before
df_note_add_problem).  That's a reasonable choice, but then it should remove
the latter notes that have become invalid because of the former.

Paolo, would this be easily doable?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]